Skip to main content

Barnett v. State

Citations

  • 834 N.E.2d 169
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 1681
  • 2005 WL 2219252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s knowledge that the property was stolen could be inferred from possession coupled with his false or evasive explanation
  • concluding that evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction for receiving stolen goods where defendant testified that he purchased videogame equipment from unknown person in a fast food drive-through for $40 and was then offered $131 for same items at nearby store soon thereafter
  • knowledge inferred from possession coupled with false or evasive explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Riley, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.