Barilla v. Lee & Palmer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant failed to satisfy the third part of the plain error test in light of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt
• admission of evidence under Rule 807 reviewed for abuse of discretion
• trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting statements under Rule 807 because the statements were made within the confines of the close relationship between the victim and her close friend, and the victim had no reason to lie to her friend regarding the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).