Skip to main content
· 6/27/1985

Federal Case

Citations

  • 764 F.2d 306
  • 1986 A.M.C. 886
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “settlement of the worker’s claim necessarily settled the employer’s subrogation claim and entitled the employer to reimbursement to the extent of the funds that the third party has agreed to pay in settlement”
  • “If a formal compensation award is not entered, the assignment provision of the [LHWCA] does not apply, even if the employer has voluntarily made compensation payments, and the right to assert the worker’s third-party cause of action remains with the worker.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.