Skip to main content
· 5/10/2000

Barfield v. Madison County, MS

Citations

  • 212 F.3d 269
  • 6 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 9536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • admonishing federal courts not to “expand state law beyond its presently existing boundaries”
  • “When adjudicating claims for which state law provides the rules of decision, we are bound to apply the law as interpreted by the state’s highest court.”
  • “Although we do not decide the matter, there is a bona fide question whether the FLSA permits the application of a state-law based indemnity remedy benefitting employers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Garwood, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.