Skip to main content

Barber v. State

Citations

  • 207 So. 3d 379
  • 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that findings are required where statute expressly provides that court shall make written findings if it determines that a felony offender of special concern has committed a violation of probation
  • holding that findings are required where statute expressly provides that court shall make written findings if it determines that a felony offender of special concern has committed a violation of probation
  • recognizing that “there are no provisions in [section 948.06(8)(e
  • finding that in making a dangerousness determination, a trial court’s findings must be based on one or more of the factors listed in section 948.06(8)(e)(1)(a)-(e), Fla. Stat. (2024)
  • reversing Barber's sentence finding him to be a VFOSC upon the third revocation of his probation and remanding for another sentencing hearing and for the trial court to make the statutorily-required written findings to support the VFOSC designation
  • \It is undisputed that Barber qualifies as a violent felony offender of special concern . . . . Barber concede[d] in the trial court that he qualifies for that designation . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evander, Lawson, Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.