Bailey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• decrying the trial court's use of a preprinted form as insufficient to satisfy the \intricacies of section 948.06(8)\
• “While the trial court did place an ‘X’ on the line indicating that it found Bailey to be a violent felony offender of special concern who posed a danger to the community, the court did not place an ‘X’ in any of the blanks to indicate which specific facts listed in section 948.06(8)(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-30· cited 17×
• KENNETH WHITTAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-05· cited 10×
• ALONSO KAOSAYAN HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-09· cited 1×
• State of Florida v. Jonathan Gomez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-15
• ROBERT SANDERS MC CRAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-02

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-04· cited 10×