Skip to main content
· 10/23/1974

Banerian v. O'MALLEY

Citations

  • 42 Cal. App. 3d 604
  • 116 Cal. Rptr. 919
  • 1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 1252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that,”[e]xcept as between plaintiffs and defendants, there is no compulsory cross-complaint in California procedure,” and that a cross-complaint is permissive between parties and nonparties
  • stating that, under 12 Section 426.30, a cross-complaint is “permissive … between parties and nonparties”
  • “Except as between plaintiffs and defendants, there is no compulsory cross-complaint in California procedure . . . . Rather, a cross-complaint is permissive as between . . . parties and nonparties.” (emphases added) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.