· 10/23/1974
Banerian v. O'MALLEY
Citations
- 42 Cal. App. 3d 604
- 116 Cal. Rptr. 919
- 1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 1252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that,”[e]xcept as between plaintiffs and defendants, there is no compulsory cross-complaint in California procedure,” and that a cross-complaint is permissive between parties and nonparties
- stating that, under 12 Section 426.30, a cross-complaint is “permissive … between parties and nonparties”
- “Except as between plaintiffs and defendants, there is no compulsory cross-complaint in California procedure . . . . Rather, a cross-complaint is permissive as between . . . parties and nonparties.” (emphases added) (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.