Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/31/1994
Ballard v. State
Citations
- 636 A.2d 474
- 333 Md. 567
- 1994 Md. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that when the charged crime is homicide, “the corpus delecti consists of proof that the victim died and that the death was caused by a criminal act, but it need not tend to connect the defendant on trial with that act”
- approving the rule requiring independent corroboration of “only the major or essential harm involved in the charged offense”
- approving the rule requiring independent corroboration of “only the major or essential harm involved in the charged offense”
- “[I]n a homicide case, the corpus delicti consists of proof that the victim died and that the death was caused by a criminal act, but it need not tend to connect the defendant on trial with that act.”
- discussing the “national overview of the corroboration requirement”
- discussing the “national overview of the corroboration requirement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-01-29· cited 360×
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 219×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1994-10-21· cited 192×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-19· cited 58×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-20· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-04-03· cited 40×
- Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-05-04· cited 23×
- Nicholson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-05· cited 5×
- McArthur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-21· cited 4×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-17· cited 86×
- Hadder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-14· cited 74×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-10· cited 66×
- Birchead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-04· cited 65×
- Thanos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-05· cited 64×
- Bagley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-19· cited 34×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-02· cited 33×
- Bradbury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-01-30· cited 33×
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-12-14· cited 29×
- Hurley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-16· cited 25×
- Lemons v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-01· cited 24×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-13· cited 24×
- Duckworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-23· cited 16×
- Crouch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.