Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. Hansen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a contractual “prohibition against assignment does not prevent assignment of a cause of action under the contract”
• causes in action were partnership assets
• causes in action were partnership assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lantzy v. Centex Homes
  California Supreme Court· 2003-08-04· cited 258×
• April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTV
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-10-05· cited 222×
• Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-12-07· cited 88×
• In Re Cheryl E.
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-02· cited 73×
• Parsons v. Tickner
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-02-02· cited 57×
• Bader v. Cox
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-12-09· cited 54×
• Perez-Encinas v. Amerus Life Insurance
  N.D. California· 2006-07-26· cited 24×
• Moseley v. Abrams
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-07-22· cited 21×
• Watts v. Crocker-Citizens National Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-06-03· cited 14×
• Randall J. Matsumoto, and Nancy E. Matsumoto v. Republic Insurance Company, and Blue Ridge Insurance Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-06-19· cited 12×
• In Re Marriage of Zells
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-19· cited 7×
• Quartz of Southern California, Inc. v. Mullen Bros.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-31· cited 6×
• Stoneson Development Corp. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-12-22· cited 4×
• Kahn v. Gordon
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-03-27· cited 2×
• Lantzy v. Centex Homes
  California Supreme Court· 2003-08-27· cited 1×
• County of Ventura Public Social Services Agency v. Edwin E.
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-02· cited 1×
• Morris v. Zusman
  D. Oregon· 2012-03-09· cited 1×