S.D. New York· 10/17/2013
Bale v. Nastasi
Citations
- 982 F. Supp. 2d 250
- 2013 WL 6038051
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163782
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[w]here each side ... tells a story that is at least plausible and would allow a jury to find in its favor, it is for the jury to make the credibility determinations and apportion liability, and not for the court”
- stating that “[w]here each side ... tells a story that is at least plausible and would allow a jury to find in its favor, it is for the jury to make the credibility determinations and apportion liability, and not for the court”
- stating that “[w]here each side ... tells a story that is at least plausible and would allow a jury to find in its favor, it is for the jury to make the credibility determinations and apportion liability, and not for the court”
- stating that “[w]here each side ... tells a story that is at least plausible and would allow a jury to find in its favor, it is for the jury to make the credibility determinations and apportion liability, and not for the court”
- stating that “[w]here each side ... tells a story that is at least plausible and would allow a jury to find in its favor, it is for the jury to make the credibility determinations and apportion liability, and not for the court”
- stating that “[w]here each side ... tells a story that is at least plausible and would allow a jury to find in its favor, it is for the jury to make the credibility determinations and apportion liability, and not for the court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanSecond Circuit· 1991-01-17· cited 1,081×
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1995-03-24· cited 917×
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 840×
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals· 1963-05-09· cited 756×
- Fincher v. Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.Second Circuit· 2010-05-14· cited 634×
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-11-17· cited 601×
- Polzo v. County of EssexSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-12-03· cited 398×
- McPherson v. New York City Department of EducationSecond Circuit· 2006-07-13· cited 351×
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesSecond Circuit· 1994-01-04· cited 216×
- Vito Tufariello v. Long Island Railroad Company, Docket No. 05-1945-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-07-20· cited 147×
- Jerry Keith and Connie Keith v. Truck Stops Corporation of America, John Doe or John Doe Inc. Appeal of Truckstops of America CorporationThird Circuit· 1990-07-24· cited 96×
- Brown v. Racquet Club of BricktownSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-02-14· cited 83×
- Maher v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-08-01· cited 59×
- Wentworth v. HedsonE.D. New York· 2007-06-26· cited 27×
- Housel v. TheodoridisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-09-04· cited 26×
- John J. Magan v. Lufthansa German AirlinesSecond Circuit· 2003-08-12· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.