· 3/24/1995
Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 51 F.3d 14
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6142
- 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,478
- 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 603
- 1995 WL 127071
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that conclusory statements, conjecture and other types of unsupported assertions are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
- holding that party may not rely on conclusory statements or an argument that the affidavits in support of the motion for summary judgment are not credible
- holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim
- holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim
- holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim
- holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oakes, Kearse, Cabranes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.