Skip to main content
· 3/24/1995

Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 51 F.3d 14
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6142
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,478
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 603
  • 1995 WL 127071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conclusory statements, conjecture and other types of unsupported assertions are not sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
  • holding that party may not rely on conclusory statements or an argument that the affidavits in support of the motion for summary judgment are not credible
  • holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim
  • holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim
  • holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim
  • holding that a movant’s burden is satisfied if he can point to an absence of evidence to support an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Kearse, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.