Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/7/2013

Baker v. State

Citations

297 Kan. 486
303 P.3d 675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding \the 1-year time limitation for bringing an action under K.S.A. 60-1507 begins to run after the period for taking a direct appeal from the [resentencing] expires.\
measuring one-year statute of limitations in K.S.A. 60-1507[f] from milestones in criminal case, including resentencing on remand
K.S.A. 60-1507 does not permit relief when movant not in custody under sentence being challenged
“We have explicitly stated that Rule 183 prohibits simultaneous pursuit of a direct appeal and a motion under K.S.A. 60-1507. [Citation omitted.]”
\[T]he 1-year time limitation for bringing an action under K.S.A. 60-1507 begins to run after the period for taking a direct appeal from the [resentencing] expires.\
1-year period to file a motion under K.S.A. 60-1507 begins the date the mandate is issued in the underlying appeal when the movant is in custody under sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Moritz, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.