District of Columbia· 12/10/2002
Baker v. Potter
Citations
- 212 F.R.D. 8
- 56 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 995
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23804
- 2002 WL 31777889
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ”[W]ithdrawal is permissible if a party demonstrates that withdrawal will serve the presentation of the merits without prejudicing the party who requested the admissions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-12· cited 4×
- Centrifugal Acquisition Corp. v. MoonE.D. Wisconsin· 2010-04-13· cited 3×
- Essroc Cement Corp. v. cti/d.C., Inc.District of Columbia· 2010-09-27
- Seo v. OhDistrict of Columbia· 2019-09-26
- Daniels v. Chugach Government Services, Inc.District of Columbia· 2019-10-18
- Mejia v. Cathedral Lane LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2022-04-25
- Trustees of the Iam National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2023-09-18
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kerry Steel, Inc. v. Paragon Industries, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1997-02-07· cited 328×
- Donald Barth v. Bruce S. Gelb, Director, United States Information AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1993-08-27· cited 238×
- Michael Perez v. Miami-Dade CountyEleventh Circuit· 2002-07-17· cited 202×
- Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1995-01-23· cited 160×
- Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems DivisionFirst Circuit· 1982-08-20· cited 154×
- United States v. KasuboskiSeventh Circuit· 1987-11-25· cited 115×
- Breen v. Department of TransportationD.C. Circuit· 2002-03-15· cited 70×
- Donovan v. Carls Drug Company, Inc.Second Circuit· 1983-03-22· cited 61×
- Scott Armstrong, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Executive Office of the President, Appellants/cross-AppelleesD.C. Circuit· 1996-08-02· cited 59×
- Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloD.C. Circuit· 1983-01-04· cited 54×
- United States v. Golden Acres, Inc.D. Delaware· 1988-04-15· cited 29×
- Rabil v. SwaffordDistrict of Columbia· 1989-10-23· cited 20×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1990-05-22· cited 17×
- Foretich v. ChungDistrict of Columbia· 1993-07-29· cited 17×
- Davis v. NoufalDistrict of Columbia· 1992-05-18· cited 16×
- The American Automobile Association (Incorporated) v. Aaa Legal Clinic Of Jefferson CrookeFifth Circuit· 1991-05-13· cited 15×
- Armstrong v. Executive Office of the PresidentDistrict of Columbia· 1995-02-14· cited 14×
- In Re the Complaint of Fisherman's Wharf Fillet, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 1999-12-20· cited 12×
- LaCorte v. O'NEILLDistrict of Columbia· 2001-03-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.