Skip to main content
· 12/20/1999

In Re the Complaint of Fisherman's Wharf Fillet, Inc.

Citations

  • 83 F. Supp. 2d 651
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21306
  • 1999 WL 1442626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[c]learly, no absolute right to withdraw admissions exists” under Rule 36(b)
  • “The Court finds that no tenable explanation exists for the failure of the attorneys to respond to the varied pleadings in this case that would serve to excuse the Claimant from the defaults of her counsel.”
  • “With the passage of time and as each moment for response to a pleading slipped by [the movant’s] burden for withdrawal of the deemed admissions is raised and the prejudice to the [relying party] is increased.”
  • “[N]o absolute right to withdraw admissions exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.