Skip to main content
· 4/18/1984

Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc.

Citations

  • 314 S.E.2d 874
  • 252 Ga. 458
  • 1984 Ga. LEXIS 735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that contemporaneous written agreements may he used to establish the intent of the parties in entering each of the agreements
  • three contemporaneously executed written agreements could be construed together to determine terms and conditions of option to purchase realty
  • three contemporaneously executed written agreements could be construed together to determine terms and conditions of option to purchase realty
  • three documents executed on same day contemporaneous although they do not refer to each other
  • multiple documents meeting this test satisfy the statutory requirements and purpose of the Statute of Frauds
  • “entire agreement” clause did not prevent the consideration of parol evidence to explain the terms of an option contract that, on its own, was vague and indefinite

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Smith, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.