· 4/18/1984
Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc.
Citations
- 314 S.E.2d 874
- 252 Ga. 458
- 1984 Ga. LEXIS 735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that contemporaneous written agreements may he used to establish the intent of the parties in entering each of the agreements
- three contemporaneously executed written agreements could be construed together to determine terms and conditions of option to purchase realty
- three contemporaneously executed written agreements could be construed together to determine terms and conditions of option to purchase realty
- three documents executed on same day contemporaneous although they do not refer to each other
- multiple documents meeting this test satisfy the statutory requirements and purpose of the Statute of Frauds
- “entire agreement” clause did not prevent the consideration of parol evidence to explain the terms of an option contract that, on its own, was vague and indefinite
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Smith, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.