Board of Regents of University System of Georgia v. Tyson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the essential term of consideration was not contained in the 35 contract but instead had to be implied from the parties’ conduct, there was no written contract for sovereign immunity purposes
• contract where essential term of consideration had to be implied from the parties’ conduct was not a written contract for sovereign immunity purposes
• contract where essential term of consideration had to be implied from the parties’ conduct was not a written contract for sovereign immunity purposes
• no written agreement where multiple contemporaneous documents did not contain all the necessary terms of agreement
• consent to care form and other parts of the medical record, taken together, did not constitute contemporaneous writings forming a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).