Supreme Court of Georgia· 10/3/2005
Baisden v. State
Citations
- 620 S.E.2d 369
- 279 Ga. 702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversal required where defendant was neither advised of his right against compulsory self-incrimination nor of his right to confront witnesses
- where prosecutor’s “affidavit merely state [d] that the trial judge would have asked questions ‘similar’ to a list which included inquiries regarding the Boykin rights, but which also addressed other matters”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- LEJEUNE v. McLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-11-24· cited 47×
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 23×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-10-03· cited 12×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-02-20· cited 11×
- Sanders v. HolderSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-09-28· cited 8×
- Denson v. FrazierSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-01-26· cited 5×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Bazemore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-10-10· cited 33×
- Britt v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-11-19· cited 30×
- Foskey v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-01-12· cited 21×
- Knight v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-09-21· cited 14×
- Bennett v. L. L. Blocker EstateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-03-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.