Baisden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversal required where defendant was neither advised of his right against compulsory self-incrimination nor of his right to confront witnesses
• where prosecutor’s “affidavit merely state [d] that the trial judge would have asked questions ‘similar’ to a list which included inquiries regarding the Boykin rights, but which also addressed other matters”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).