Skip to main content

Bailey v. Upper Southampton Township

Citations

  • 690 A.2d 1324
  • 1997 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 121
  • 1997 WL 123703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the Board’s finding that the proposed expansion will increase traffic is not supported by substantial evidence of record” since “[tjhere is absolutely no evidence other than the speculative testimony of the neighbors that there will be an increase in traffic congestion.”
  • stating that “a conditional use is nothing more than a special exception which falls within the jurisdiction of the municipal legislative body, rather than the zoning hearing board”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colins, Flaherty, Narick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.