District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/28/1982
Bailey v. United States
Citations
- 447 A.2d 779
- 1982 D.C. App. LEXIS 402
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- brief pause and change of voice tone insufficient
- brief pause and change of voice tone insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Kelly, Mack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dorman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-04-25· cited 35×
- Baptist v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-09-09· cited 19×
- Reed v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-12-27· cited 16×
- State v. BoucherSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-03-30· cited 12×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-23· cited 9×
- Dorman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-04-22· cited 9×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-06-09· cited 8×
- RENALDO K. LUCAS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-10-30· cited 8×
- James v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-08· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Charles H. CarterD.C. Circuit· 1973-07-12· cited 44×
- Fields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-29· cited 42×
- United States v. Roland R. HenryD.C. Circuit· 1976-01-19· cited 29×
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-08-05· cited 27×
- Henry E. Higgins v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-06-28· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.