Bailey v. Atlantic Automotive Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff has alleged a cognizable RICO injury where plaintiff alleged that “she suffered the claimed loss at the moment of purchase in reliance upon the false representation that she was not buying a former short-term rental vehicle.”
• holding alleged enterprise comprising a car dealership, its parent corporation, and the parent’s other subsidiaries—all defendants—was not distinct
• providing that a “plaintiff must plead ‘circumstances of the fraudulent acts that form the alleged pattern of racketeering activity with sufficient specificity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).’”
• concerning plaintiffs’ standing to raise claims of third parties against defendants with whom they had no dealings in the context of a putative class action
• discussing the purchase of a used car that the defendant represented as new
• “A plaintiff must plead circumstances of the fraudulent acts that form the alleged pattern of racketeering activity with sufficient specificity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).