Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
D. Maryland· 1/17/2014

Bailey v. Atlantic Automotive Corp.

Citations

  • 992 F. Supp. 2d 560
  • 2014 WL 204262
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff has alleged a cognizable RICO injury where plaintiff alleged that “she suffered the claimed loss at the moment of purchase in reliance upon the false representation that she was not buying a former short-term rental vehicle.”
  • holding alleged enterprise comprising a car dealership, its parent corporation, and the parent’s other subsidiaries—all defendants—was not distinct
  • providing that a “plaintiff must plead ‘circumstances of the fraudulent acts that form the alleged pattern of racketeering activity with sufficient specificity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).’”
  • concerning plaintiffs’ standing to raise claims of third parties against defendants with whom they had no dealings in the context of a putative class action
  • discussing the purchase of a used car that the defendant represented as new
  • “A plaintiff must plead circumstances of the fraudulent acts that form the alleged pattern of racketeering activity with sufficient specificity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garbis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.