Skip to main content
· 11/15/1920

Bahrey v. Poniatishin

Citations

  • 95 N.J.L. 128
  • 112 A. 481
  • 1920 N.J. LEXIS 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Generally, courts do not consider new arguments and new evidence raised in objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation that were not raised, and thus were not considered, by the magistrate judge.”
  • “Generally, courts do not consider new arguments and new evidence raised in objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation that were not raised, and thus were not considered, by the magistrate judge.” (quoting Grant v. Bradt, 2012 WL 3764548, at (S.D.N.Y.2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aciíeeson, Affirmance, Bebgen, Cueiaii, Gaednee, Heepbntieimer, Kalisoh, Katzbnbach, None, Parkee, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Taylor, Trenohakd, White, Williamh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.