Bagley v. BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The right to judicially contest an election did not exist at common law, and is a purely statutory creature. The court’s power and procedure are governed by ‘the statute alone.’ ” (quoting Bradburn v. Wasco County, 55 Or 539, 541, 106 P 1018 (1910))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Meury v. Jarrell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-01-21· cited 9×
• Thomas v. Penfold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-10-28· cited 8×
• Lane Education Service District v. Swanson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-12-12· cited 3×
• Eustace v. Speckhart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-09-14· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Poddar v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-27· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richard v. Slate
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-12-03· cited 39×
• Wink v. Marshall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-05-27· cited 26×
• Fry v. Willamalane Park & Recreation District
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-02-25· cited 22×
• Combs v. Groener
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-07-22· cited 9×
• Bradburn v. Wasco County
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1910-02-15· cited 6×