Skip to main content
· 5/27/1964

Wink v. Marshall

Citations

  • 392 P.2d 768
  • 237 Or. 589
  • 1964 Ore. LEXIS 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • subject-matter jurisdiction “cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel”
  • “Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel.”
  • “[jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can it be cured by waiver, or by estoppel”
  • “Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel.”
  • subject-matter jurisdiction “cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAllister, Rossman, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Denecke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.