· 5/27/1964
Wink v. Marshall
Citations
- 392 P.2d 768
- 237 Or. 589
- 1964 Ore. LEXIS 396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- subject-matter jurisdiction “cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel”
- “Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel.”
- “[jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can it be cured by waiver, or by estoppel”
- “Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel.”
- subject-matter jurisdiction “cannot be conferred by the parties by consent, nor can the want of jurisdiction be remedied by waiver, or by estoppel”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAllister, Rossman, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Denecke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.