Babin v. Wilson (In Re Wilson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he bankruptcy court’s reading here is inconsistent with how the IRS applies its own standards”
• noting if debtor with unencumbered vehicle needed a new car during chapter 13 case, debtor could move to modify plan based on changed circumstances
• \[A] vehicle ownership expense is only applicable if a debtor is in fact incurring such an expense.\
• “it is only the payments that affect the debtor’s ability to repay his creditors” (emphasis in original)
• “[A] vehicle ownership expense is only applicable if a debtor is in fact incurring such an expense.”
• “[Wjhile bankruptcy courts have been divided on this issue, the appellate courts considering this question have all concluded that a vehicle ownership expense is only applicable if a debtor is in fact incurring such an expense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).