A.W. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that N.R.S. 18.015(4)(b) does not require an affirmative 26 recovery for a retaining lien because the lien attaches to “any file or other property 27 properly left in the possession of the attorney by his or her client”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• Stanley v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
• State Ex Rel. B.R.
  Utah Supreme Court· 2007-10-26· cited 350×
• State v. Menzies
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-03-29· cited 259×
• State Ex Rel. E.R.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2001-03-08· cited 254×
• State v. Thomas
  Utah Supreme Court· 1998-05-22· cited 196×
• State ex rel. K.F. v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 2009-01-23· cited 119×
• State v. Green
  Utah Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 77×
• D.T. v. C.M.
  Utah Supreme Court· 2011-12-01· cited 21×
• State, in Interest of Cb
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-10-15· cited 14×
• In re K.C.
  Utah Supreme Court· 2015-11-24· cited 12×
• In re K.K.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2017-03-30· cited 8×
• D.A. v. D.H.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-06-19· cited 6×