Avgoustis v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Requiring detailed disclosure of subject matter could conceivably implicate the attorney-client privilege in unusual circumstances....”
• affirming deduction of hours for entries that simply stated “draft client correspondence” as too vague
• affirming Veterans Court’s reduction of 2.5 hours out of 31.6 claimed hours in an Equal Access to Justice Act fee application based on vagueness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).