Court of International Trade· 5/20/1991
Auto Telecom Co., Ltd. v. United States
Citations
- 765 F. Supp. 1094
- 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 231
- 15 C.I.T. 231
- 13 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1473
- 1991 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing the two distinct inquires in (1) making a dumping determination and (2) ordering a cash deposit rate
- in two company investigation, BIA rate based on Japanese affiliate excluded from application to “all others” and verified zero rate based on Taiwanese data applied to Taiwanese “all others”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Restani
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dupont Teijin Films Usa, Lp v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-05-12· cited 35×
- National Knitwear & Sportswear Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 1991-11-15· cited 21×
- Dupont Teijin Films USA, LP v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2003-07-09· cited 11×
- Floral Trade Council v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 1992-07-30· cited 7×
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2020-01-10· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.