National Knitwear & Sportswear Ass'n v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the application of a punitive, or even quasi-punitive, rate to innocent parties would be contrary to the intent that the antidumping law be remedial
• noting that anti-dumping duty law “is intended to be remedial, not punitive” in nature
• affirming Commerce’s exclusion of BIA rates from “all others” rate where rátes are not representative of pricing practices
• excluding “best information available” rate to calculate estimated dumping margins because it does not reasonably reflect pricing practices for subject merchandise
• discussing 19 U.S.C. § 1673d(a)(l) (1988) and 19 U.S.C. § 1673e(a)(l) (1988)
• “[T]he courts require exhaustion of administrative remedies to ensure that the agency and the interested parties fully develop the facts to aid judicial review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).