Nevada Supreme Court· 12/7/1971

Austin v. State

Citations

491 P.2d 724
87 Nev. 578
1971 Nev. LEXIS 482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that in determining if sufficient evidence corroborates accomplice's testimony, that testimony must be eliminated and remaining evidence examined to ascertain if there is inculpatory evidence tending to connect defendant to offense
observing that in determining if sufficient evidence corroborates accomplice's testimony, that testimony must be eliminated and remaining evidence examined to ascertain if there is inculpatory evidence tending to connect defendant to offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunderson, Thompson, Zenoff, Batjer, Mowbray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.