August J. Serio v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• words “another man” substituted for the name of the defendant in the implicating confession which went to the jury; the court felt that in that case the jury’s association of the defendant with the other man was “well-nigh inevitable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).