· 2/27/1992
United States v. Stephen Washington, United States of America v. Christopher Jones
Citations
- 952 F.2d 1402
- 293 U.S. App. D.C. 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where use of redacted statement distorted defendant’s statements in his favor, no prejudice to the defendant was found
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Silberman, Ginsburg, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.