· 8/4/2005
Audi AG v. D'AMATO
Citations
- 381 F. Supp. 2d 644
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20476
- 2005 WL 1870033
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the defendant’s use of the Audi Trademarks in the domain names satisfies the “identical or confusingly similar requirement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Borman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.