Wynn Oil Company and Classic Car Wash, Inc. v. Michael F. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bulk car wax and complete car washing service of one party and car care products of other party offered consumers the fundamentally same thing: a clean car
• finding that car wash service and seller of car care products “fundamentally are selling the same thing — a clean car”
• noting that “[e]vidence of actual confusion is undoubtedly the best evidence of likelihood of confusion”
• \holding that bulk car wax and complete car washing service of one party and car care products of other party offered consumers the fundamentally same thing: a clean car\
• finding consumer could easily assume producer of car wash products had expanded into car wash business
• finding national marketing effort of one party inevitably overlapped opponent's local advertising campaign to some degree, although overlap probably would not increase likelihood of confusion significantly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).