Skip to main content

Atwood v. Hicks by Hicks

Citations

  • 538 So. 2d 404
  • 1989 WL 2631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court-approved settlement of paternity and support actions could be re-opened, long after the fact, only upon proof of fraud, sham, pretense, or collusion in the procurement
  • right to support belongs to child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Robertson and Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.