Sawyer v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resting on Supremacy Clause to reject plaintiff’s argument that “the federal government has no authority to tell us what rules of evidence to enforce in the courts of this state”
• affirming exclusion of testimony and exhibits of state highway department officials regarding hazardousness of crossing, and holding that federal statute is binding on state courts under Supremacy Clause
• available at 1994 Del.Super.LEXIS 383

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).