Skip to main content
· 6/16/2022

Attorney Grievance v. Wemple

Citations

  • 479 Md. 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing city ordinance that regulated nude dancing from common law offense that flatly prohibited “exhibiting one’s private parts in public”
  • finding no constitutional right to jury tidal for violation of topless dancing regulations
  • “Nowhere does Derendal instruct that the elements of the modern-day offense must be identical to a common-law antecedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hotten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.