Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the word “any” may mean a single item if “used in [the] context of [a] singular noun”
• refusing to adopt a textually plausible interpretation of a statute because it was \farfetched that Congress meant ... to start down such a road in the absence of any clearer signal\
• refusing to adopt a broad reading of “any entity” where doing so would have resulted in federal interference in the relationship between states and their political subdivisions
• describing Missouri municipalities challenging state law prohibiting governmental entry into telecom market
• “Court[s] will not construe a statute in a manner that leads to absurd or futile results”
• applying Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).