Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/22/1984
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Moore
Citations
- 482 A.2d 497
- 301 Md. 169
- 1984 Md. LEXIS 357
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that disbarment, the sanction imposed in the District of Columbia, was the appropriate sanction for misappropriation of client funds for Maryland attorneys
- holding that disbarment, the sanction imposed in the District of Columbia, was the appropriate sanction for misappropriation of client funds for Maryland attorneys
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, Menchine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Attorney Grievance Commission v. Moore
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-04-22· cited 15×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-01-20· cited 11×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-15· cited 2×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.