Attorney Grievance Commission v. Carithers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the attorney’s misappropriation of funds and failure to maintain a client trust account was conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
• noting that “the intentional misappropriation of client funds is conduct which erodes the public confidence in the legal profession”
• concluding that an attorney violated Rule 8.4(c
• disbarring attorney for conduct including misappropriation of attorney’s fees owed to his law firm
• disbarring attorney for conduct including misappropriation of attorney’s fees owed to his law firm
• clear and convincing evidence that attorney violated Md.Code Ann., Crim. Law § 7-104(a)(l), thereby establishing a violation of MLRPC 8.4(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).