Skip to main content
· 6/19/2014

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDowell

Citations

  • 439 Md. 26
  • 93 A.3d 711
  • 2014 WL 2766673
  • 2014 Md. LEXIS 373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • lawyer not responsible under MLRPC 5.3(c)(2) because the attorney took reasonable remedial action once he learned of the misconduct
  • “[T]his Court reviews for clear error a hearing judge’s findings of fact[.]” (Citations omitted)
  • This Court held that a lawyer’s misconduct was mitigated by “other penalties in the form of being sued, receiving adverse media coverage, voluntarily stopping the active practice of law, and withdrawing from the [the lawyer’s law firm], which no longer [bore the lawyer’s name[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.