Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/24/2014

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gray

Citations

436 Md. 513
83 A.3d 786
2014 WL 282032
2014 Md. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the attorney violated MLRPC 8.1(b) when he failed to respond to two letters from the Attorney Grievance Commission
holding attorney violated Rule 8.1(b) by failing to respond to two letters from the Commission regarding grievance complaint
supplementing the hearing judge’s findings of fact with undisputed information adduced at the disciplinary hearing
“Pursuant to MLRPC 8.1(b), an attorney must answer timely requests from the [] Commission regarding a complaint in a potential disciplinary manner.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (brackets in original)
“Pursuant to MLRPC 8.1(b), an attorney must answer timely requests from the [ ] Commission regarding a complaint in a potential disciplinary matter.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (brackets in original)
attorney indefinitely suspended after continually delaying the litigation of her client’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Harrell, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gray

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.