Federal Circuit· 7/3/2019
Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs., LLC
Citations
- 927 F.3d 1333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The concreteness and specificity of the claims in Athena move them from reciting a law of nature to a particular application of a law of na- ture.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2020-03-17· cited 9×
- American Axle & Manufacturing v. Neapco Holdings LLCFederal Circuit· 2020-10-23· cited 3×
- American Axle & Manufacturing v. Neapco Holdings LLCFederal Circuit· 2020-07-31
- Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2020-08-03
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,022×
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 1,430×
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court· 2015-06-25· cited 932×
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 915×
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 669×
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationFederal Circuit· 2016-05-12· cited 648×
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 573×
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Federal Circuit· 2016-08-01· cited 524×
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court· 1981-03-03· cited 498×
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 485×
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court· 2016-06-13· cited 467×
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court· 1972-11-20· cited 442×
- Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 439×
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 381×
- Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 377×
- McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-09-13· cited 364×
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.Supreme Court· 2013-06-13· cited 363×
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court· 1978-06-22· cited 347×
- Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLCFederal Circuit· 2014-11-14· cited 347×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.