Nevada Supreme Court· 1/3/1997

Ashwood v. Clark County

Citations

930 P.2d 740
113 Nev. 80
1997 Nev. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Clark County Building Code did not establish a duty giving rise to negligence per se
stating that “[a] violation of statute establishes the duty and breach elements” of a negligence action
stating that “[a] violation of statute establishes the duty and breach elements” of a negligence action
concluding as a matter of law that the plaintiff was not a member of the class of persons that the building code was intended to protect
concluding as a matter of law that the plaintiff was not a member of the class of persons that the building code was intended to protect
finding that the “common law duty of reasonable care did 9 not give rise to a specific duty” to keep every gate unlocked in a park

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Springer, Steffen, Young, Shearing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.