Ascencio-Rodriguez v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold today that the BIA’s interpretation of the 1 Notably, Salas-Acuna does not challenge the BIA’s interpretation of § 1229b(1)(A
• “Aliens not admitted are treated as ‘applicants for admission.’” (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1225(A)(1)
• “Although no Court of Appeals has rejected the central holding of In re Romalez-Alcaide, several have held that it does not apply in cases where an alien is simply turned away at the border”
• “Although no Court of Appeals has rejected the central holding of In re Romalez-Alcaide, several have held that it does not apply in cases where an alien is simply turned away at the border”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).