Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/25/2014

Asarco LLC v. Goodwin

Citations

  • 756 F.3d 191
  • 2014 WL 2870117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that newly added claims “based on different conduct, in a different location, and attributable to different [individuals] than the claims set forth in [the original] pleading” did not relate back
  • noting that “resolution occurs when a [PRP] is released from CERCLA liability”
  • applying a limitations period to each settlement agreement when determining whether the plaintiff’s § 113(f)(3)(B) claims are time barred
  • “[T]he basic claim must have arisen out of the conduct set forth in the original pleading.”
  • “[T]he principal purpose of limitations periods in [CERCLA cases is] ‘ensuring that the responsible parties get to the bargaining—and clean-up—table sooner rather than later.’” (cleaned up
  • “[W]e have held that CERCLA encompasses such successor liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Kearse, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Asarco LLC v. Goodwin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.