Skip to main content
· 8/28/2007

Marsh v. Rosenbloom

Citations

  • 499 F.3d 165
  • 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20221
  • 65 ERC (BNA) 1097
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20555
  • 2007 WL 2416543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “CERCLA does not preempt state statutes that limit a party’s capacity to be sued.”
  • \That a ... plaintiff ... might find it impossible to comply with both [state and federal] statutes in some circumstances is not enough to establish an actual conflict between the two in this case.\
  • “[H]ow long and upon what terms a state-created corporation may continue to exist is a matter exclusively of state power.” (quoting Chi. Title & Tr. Co. v. 4136 Wilcox Bldg. Corp., 302 U.S. 120, 127-28 (1937))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Pooler, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.