Arthur v. Catour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting recovery to amount paid “confers a significant benefit” to the defendant, “contrary to the collateral source” rule
• the purpose of compensatory tort damages is to compensate the plaintiff, not to punish defendants or “bestow a windfall upon plaintiffs” (quoting Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc. 131 Ill. 2d 308, 321 (1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robinson v. Bates
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-12-20· cited 173×
• Arthur v. Catour
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-07-21· cited 95×
• Papke v. Harbert
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-08-15· cited 51×
• Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-28· cited 43×
• Robinson v. Bates
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2005-04-22· cited 21×
• Volunteers of America v. Gardenswartz
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2010-11-15· cited 7×
• Stanley v. Walker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-06-03· cited 4×
• Yanez v. SOMA Environmental Engineering, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-06-24· cited 1×
• v. Delta Air Lines, Inc
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-05-23
• Sylvestre v. Martin
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2008-01-04
• Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2023-09-29

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 156×
• Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical Center
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-01-29· cited 112×
• Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 112×
• Hanif v. Housing Authority
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-04-21· cited 95×
• Acuar v. Letourneau
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2000-06-09· cited 89×
• Barreto v. City of Waukegan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-05-07· cited 87×
• Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1925-12-16· cited 87×
• Hardi v. Mezzanotte
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-03-20· cited 53×
• Haselden v. Davis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-03-24· cited 47×
• First Midwest Trust Co. v. Rogers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-04-03· cited 43×
• Bates v. Hogg
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-08-02· cited 36×
• McAmis v. Wallace
  W.D. Virginia· 1997-10-06· cited 33×
• Boden v. Crawford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-29· cited 16×
• Calva-Cerqueira v. United States
  District of Columbia· 2003-09-10· cited 16×
• Mitchell v. Hayes
  W.D. Virginia· 1999-11-01· cited 14×