Arnold v. Taco Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “there is competent substantial evidence in the record supporting a conclusion that an identifiable public controversy existed” (footnote omitted)
• party could not argue that granting motion for change of venue was reversible error where the same party specifically stated at trial that there was no objection to the change
• “Under the limited public figure concept, only statements relating to the controversy giving rise to the public figure status receive the protection of the actual malice standard.”
• “Under the limited public figure concept, only statements relating to the controversy giving rise to the public figure status receive the protection of the actual malice standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).