Skip to main content
· 8/16/2023

JAMES W. YOUNG, JR. v. MARY STRUNK KOPCHAK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming Board’s assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that “any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing” the flow of interstate commerce
  • “[A]ny widespread application of the practices here charged might well result in .... labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce.”
  • over $55,-000 worth of raw materials purchased outside state; products shipped out of state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.